Articles on Presidential Elections – the Good and the Bad

The Good

1. PE 2011 – Paradoxes and Perils of a Politicised Role by Catherine Lim

This is the best article that I’ve read that focuses more on what happens next rather than analysing what ‘went wrong’ or simply criticizing the PAP. Catherine Lim traces the changes in people’s perception of the role of the President during this GE and what this means for Tony Tan and future Presidential Elections. It’s not an easy piece to get through, but it’s definitely a worthwhile read!

2. The perfume of emollient moderation [Alex Au]

Alex Au has written many articles post-PE, and this is the easier read. He postulates a possible ‘strategy’ that future parties can take to ensure success (based on his observations of TCB’s popularity). The comments on the post are worth reading too!

The other article Very little tactical voting in Presidential contest really requires intense concentration to follow his argument and statistics.

3. Analysis of PE2011 Results, Hard Truths from the PE and Who can be the next President by Yee Jenn Jong

I really like Jenn Jong’s style of writing – crisp, clear yet insightful and thought-provoking. Jenn Jong is obviously someone who doesn’t just post based on emotional reaction to what he reads or sees and is truly involved in politics.

4. Four Lessons from the 2011 Presidential Elections [from New Asia Republic, by Terence Chong]

Clearly presented and I particularly liked point 3 on court politics because it brought an additional dimension to how our society is evolving not touched upon in any of the other articles already mentioned. 

5. Micropolling results of PE 2011

Breakdown of votes for each PE candidate by constituency. This is just hard and fast facts – no analysis here, which is great because you can do your own analysis. Note that this is not official data and reported by volunteers after a very late night. 

The Bad [i.e. read with a critical mind]

I’ve scanned through most of the other blog entries, which present similar ideas to the articles above less eloquently. I wasn’t quite impressed with the representation of issues from overseas press though, namely Wall Street Journal’s Singapore Divides over Elite Rule and The Economist’s Tantamount to a humiliation.

Like Alex Au’s article states, the whole PE wasn’t really about supporters of PAP vs. opposition supporters – which is what both articles seem to reduce the debate to. The electorate was much more complex and there are many out there who still believe in the PAP, but also want more moderation and control.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s